Menkopolhukam Wiranto (kiri) bersama mantan Presiden dan Perdana Menteri Timor Leste Xanana Gusmao usai melakukan pertemuan terbatas di Jakarta, Minggu (21/8/2016). Dalam pertemuan tersebut membahas batas perairan laut antara Indonesia, Australia dan Timor Leste.

Jakarta, Aktual.com – Lawsuit of Jakarta Governor Basuki Tjahaja Purnama (Ahok) of Article 70 paragraph 3 of the Law to the Constitutional Court elections are considered wrong.

Politicians Gerindra Habiburokhman deem reason Ahok refused leave of absence during the campaign as an incumbent candidate, not according to the Law in force. Where Ahok quibble refused to leave the campaign for the sake of the people. Namely to participate in supervising the local budget discussion in 2017 DKI.

“I think we all have the mechanisms, the Act already provides a mechanism. Without him (Ahok) can be carried out active discussion of the budget. Ahok wrong,” said Habiburokhman in the building of the Constitutional Court, Central Jakarta, Monday (22/8).

With such a mechanism, Habiburokhman sure Ahok lawsuits will be rejected by Contitutional Court (MK). Because Ahok will not be able to prove where the article conflicts with Law.

“First Mr. Ahok must prove the constitutional impairment, if it passes then the next day Mr. Ahok difficult to prove that Article 70 Paragraph 3 against the constitution,” explained he.

Habiburokhman also believes the reason Ahok compares with civil servants (PNS) related leave, is also wrong. Because Ahok himself who put themselves forward as candidates for regional leaders.

“It’s the awareness he put himself forward as a incumbent candidate. So the principle, spirit should not be any abuse of office and influence in the campaign office.”

“The campaign period, that was only for the first round, the second round it is no longer a campaign. Essentially we ask clear in our petition, we ask the judges to reject the constitutional petition Mr. Ahok,” continued Habibirokhman.

Artikel ini ditulis oleh: