Jakarta, Aktual.com – State Administrative Court (Administrative Court) has canceled the Jakarta Capital City Governor Decree No. 2238 of 2014 on the Implementation of the Granting Island Reclamation G To PT Muara Wisesa Samudera.
Constitutional law expert Irman Putra Sidin explained, Jakarta administrative court ruling has been issued explaining that Governor Decree of Jakarta Governor Basuki Tjahaja Purnama alias Ahok null and void.
“We already have the decision of the Administrative Court, violations by the state administration. This means that it must be respected,” said Irman, when contacted Aktual.com, Wednesday (1/6).
Therefore, whatever the reason the city administration must immediately order the subsidiary PT Agung Podomoro to stop the reclamation process G. Island
Maybe later want sued Jakarta administrative court ruling back to the Appeal to the Supreme Court, it does not matter. Jakarta government must carry out the administrative court ruling.
“But this Governor Decree is contrary with the Law. That the decision and the reason, it must be held,” he concluded.
As is known, the Jakarta State Administrative Court in favor of the fishermen associated reclamation project undertaken by PT Muara Wisesa Ocean, to the island G.
In the decision, the judges of the Jakarta State Administrative Court decides, reclamation permit issued by Jakarta Governor Basuki Tjahaja Purnama alias Ahok for PT Muara invalid.
“Declare Decree (SK) of Jakarta Governor No. 2238 of 2014 invalid and order the defendant (the city government) unplug the Governor Decree No. 2238 of 2014,” said Chief Justice Adhi Budhi Sulistyo in the Administrative Court building in Jakarta, Tuesday (31/5).
In consideration, the judges stated that the permission issued by the city government implementation does not comply with formal requirements, the appropriate legislation. The issuance of the permit to have collided Act No. 27 of 2007 and its amendment of Law No. 1 of 2014 on the Management of Coastal Areas and Small Islands.
In fact, the judges also decided that the reclamation project emergence of social and economic turbulence. So declared incompatible with the principle of development in the public interest.
“Where reclamation cause adverse effects on the environment which also have an impact on social and economic life of the applicant’s claim that deserves to be granted,” said Judge Adhi.
Artikel ini ditulis oleh:
