Jakarta, Aktual.com – terms of Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) to handle cases involving the Jakarta Provincial Government are not considered in line with legal corridor homeland.
Constitutional law expert Margarito Kamis discuss the handling of the case of procurement of Sumber Waras Hospital and reclamation of the northern coast of Jakarta.
“Honestly in this Jakarta case, we find the attitude of the Commission which strongly challenged the common sense of our law,” regrets Margarito, when contacted Aktual.com, Tuesday (31/5).
Master of Law graduate of the University of Hasanuddin, Makassar, it argues, the KPK should have found two items of evidence sufficient to raise the status of Sumber Waras Hospital case to the investigation stage. Similarly, the case of reclamation, which should have been a suspect from the city government.
“Sumber Waras Hospital case, it was clear there BPK call state loss. Reclamation Permit Implementation of favorable third party there is no legal basis,” he explained.
Because of the absence of the measure, said Margarito, the KPK should be questioned. He also mentioned the statement KPK deputy chairman Laode Muhammad Syarif when called if the reclamation is grand corruption cases.
He said, when the case was called grand corruption, the KPK should also touch policymakers. But until now, he continued, why the suspect only from the city council and PT Agung Podomoro.
“KPK just bave with poor people, grand corruption only Sanusi. Just like that?,” she retorted.
Artikel ini ditulis oleh:
