Jakarta, Aktual.com – legal expert from Indonesia University Margarito Kamis said, there are three items of evidence in the case of land purchases beginning Sumber Waras Hospital by Jakarta Provincial Government can be proven in court.
Margarito said third tool that is enough preliminary evidence, the Supreme Audit Agency (BPK) audit, witness testimony and expert testimony.
“That evidence is true or not, court will decide,” he said in Jakarta, Thursday (31/3).
The case was being investigated by the Commission Eradiction Curraption (KPK) and so far there are statements of KPK’s vice chairman Alexander Marwata states the KPK has not found any malicious intent in the case of land purchases Sumber Waras Hospital by the city government.
According to Margarito, malicious intent does not need to be searched by KPK investigators, because the duty to prove as a defense lawyer in the trial.
With the existence of malicious intent proposed by defendants or lawyers, the judge can decide the accused should be punished or not.
The decision of the criminal court, he said, there are only three possibilities, the charges proved and the accused be convicted, the charges not proven and the accused acquitted, or the charges proven, but what the defendant is not a criminal offense that is released or “onslaag” of all charges.
He give example the case of suspected Sisminbakum there are elements of corruption, submitted to the court and the court said there was no evidence of corruption, all released.
Artikel ini ditulis oleh:
